anti igf2 goat polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Anti Igf2 Goat Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 27 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti igf2 goat polyclonal antibody/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 27 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Imbalanced Expression of IGF2 and PCSK4 Is Associated With Overproduction of Big IGF2 in SFT With NICTH: A Pilot Study."
Article Title: Imbalanced Expression of IGF2 and PCSK4 Is Associated With Overproduction of Big IGF2 in SFT With NICTH: A Pilot Study.
Journal: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00593
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Serum IGF2 isoform analysis. (A) WIB analysis of serum IGF2 in eight patients with SFT. Patients #1 to #5 are patients with SFT without hypoglycemia, and patients #10 to #12 are patients with SFT and hypoglycemia. Molecular size markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated by lines on the left. (B) Comparison of big IGF2 production levels between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (C) Comparison of mature IGF2 production levels between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (D) Comparison of the big IGF2/mature IGF2 production-level ratio between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. P values were obtained using the t test; P , 0.05 was accepted as significant in all panels.
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Comparative analysis of gene-expression levels in SFT using qRT-PCR. (A) IGF2 mRNA expression levels in the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (B) PCSK4 mRNA expression levels in the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (C) The IGF2/PCSK4 mRNA expression-level ratio in the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. *P = 0.093, **P = 0.217, ***P = 0.006. P values were obtained using the t test. These values are not statistically significant but tentative as a result of the limited number of samples.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Comparative analysis of protein expression levels in SFT by immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) Representative images of immunohistochemistry for IGF2. (B) Representative images of immunohistochemistry for PCSK4. (C) Comparison of IGF2 expression levels between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (D) Comparison of PCSK4 expression levels between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. (E) Comparison of the IGF2/PCSK4 expression-level ratio between the non-NICTH group and the NICTH group. P values were obtained using the t test; (C and E) P , 0.05 was accepted as significant and is indicated in bold.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, Comparison